Stout has been helping both borrowers and lenders prepare for SBA audits, comply with data requests and bank regulatory requirements (AML) since the CARES Act was established. Our experience with the PPP rules detailed in the related releases and guidance has been honed by our work with hundreds of PPP borrowers, lenders, and leading law firms/attorneys. We know the red flags, risks, and mitigations to assist clients in preparation for successful interaction with government investigators and auditors.
The Stout PPP Advisory Services team is comprised of highly experienced financial professionals including (Certified Public Accountants (CPA), Chartered Financial Analysts (CFA), Certified Fraud Examiners (CFE), individuals Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF), Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (CAMS), Certified Anti-Money Laundering & Fraud Professionals (CAFP), former regulators, and financial services auditors, and compliance professionals) with collectively more than 50 years of experience, including on similar types of government programs, with agencies such as the FDIC, OCC, NCUA, HUD, and Special Inspectors General, relative to lending program compliance and enforcement.
The CARES Act of March 2020 authorized the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to provide guarantees for potentially fully forgivable loans of up to $10 million to eligible borrowers as part of the Paycheck Protection Program and nearly 12 million loans totaling $800 billion were originated. Given the extremely tight timeline between creation of the PPP and when loans could start being originated, lenders and borrowers alike were scrambling. Specifically, borrowers were trying to determine eligibility and digest the SBA’s interim rules, understand the program requirements and nuances to determine if the program was a good fit, and complete and submit an application with a lender accepting applications. Meanwhile, lenders had to establish new processes, were inundated with applications, and between the need to process applications and get the money out to small businesses fast, coupled with many of the stay-at-home and social distancing orders in many locales, lenders, and their staff were overwhelmed. Now borrowers and lenders are preparing for further government scrutiny of all PPP loans; and the policies, procedures, and processes that lenders had in place while originating those loans.
(click image below to enlarge)
The SBA has stated that they will be performing some level of review over every PPP loan, and that all PPP loans greater than $2 million will be “audited” by the SBA/Treasury. Indeed, the SBA has started reviewing loans, and in many cases granting forgiveness. However, forgiven does not necessarily mean forgotten. To be sure, some borrowers have already been “challenged” with the SBA denying, either partially or fully, the borrower’s forgiveness application based on ineligibility and/or lack of ‘necessity’.
Despite the SBA’s self-imposed 90-day timeline for reviewing forgiveness applications, the SBA has six years to conduct its audits. For borrowers that have achieved the preliminary step of “forgiveness”, the primary focus of a subsequent audit is likely to be the borrower’s self-certification of need (i.e., the ‘necessity’ certification). Additionally, the SBA audits can include affiliates and may focus scrutiny on higher-risk borrowers such as:
These audits are expected to be designed to assess eligibility and evaluate the good-faith certification that was made on the loan application that economic uncertainty made the loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the borrower. The implications of the audit may include:
Our PPP Borrower services are specifically designed to help mitigate risks related to SBA audits, related litigation, non-compliance, allegations of fraud, or misstatement. We assist our PPP borrower clients with a range of services including:
After being inundated with loan applications, changing rules and guidance, and some borrowers trying to take advantage of the PPP, many lenders need help mitigating their after-the-fact risks. A study released by University of Texas, Austin, estimated that nearly 10%, or $76 billion, of the PPP loans originated were fraudulent and/or contained material misrepresentations. This information is consistent with the slew of Department of Justice indictments, data released by the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), and other information available in the public record related to widespread and systemic fraud in COVID-related relief programs. Accordingly, even the most diligent PPP originators could have inadvertently originated fraudulent and/or misrepresented loans that should be reported to both comply with their AML obligations and help mitigate downstream regulatory and legal risk.
Now that the PPP has closed, many lenders are proactively reviewing their PPP processes and portfolio to help determine whether there may be potential downstream risks and/or liability. While the SBA guidance allowed lenders to originate loans using a streamlined process, there were still BSA/AML requirements that needed to be met, including, but not limited to:
Stout operates globally, providing corporate finance and valuation advisory, dispute consulting, expert testimony, and investment banking services. For more than 30 years we have helped our clients successfully pursue their greatest opportunities and address their most significant challenges. We currently perform more than 3,000 client engagements each year.
Webinars and Insights
Program Research and Guidance